www.uj.edu.pl<\/a>) and its organization was conducted by dr hab. prof. UJ Dobros\u0142awa Szumi\u0142o-Kulczycka.<\/p>\nOn May 26, 2022, the conference was opened by dr hab. Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska, dr. hab. Krystian Markiewicz, prof. U\u015a as the Director of the Interdisciplinary Center for Research on the Justice System and vice-rector for international affairs of University of Silesia prof. dr. hab. Tomasz Pietrzykowski.<\/p>\n
The first panel was devoted to more general issues, i.e. the impact of COVID-19 on the functioning of the judiciary. The panel was opened by Judge Jos\u00e9 Igreja Matos, President of the International Association of Judges, on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the independence of judges and the impact of the pandemic on the rule of law (Duro Sessa, President of the European Association of Judges). Subsequently, the role of the courts and the observance of the right to a fair trial in post-pandemic reality were analyzed (Ghenadie Barba, Head of the Rule of Law Department at the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) in Warsaw). Later on, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the functioning of international courts was discussed: the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg (dr hab. Maciej Szpunar prof. U\u015a, Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Silesia, First Advocate General of the CJEU) European Court of Human Rights In Strasbourg (dr. hab. Micha\u0142 Balcerzak, professor UMK, Department of Political and Security Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University) and common courts on the example of Poland (Dr. Urszula \u017b\u00f3\u0142tak, judge, Association of Polish Judges \u201cIustitia\u201d).<\/p>\n
The second part presented what changes in the procedural civil law system were introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic. This issue in the comparative legal aspect was discussed by prof. dr Anna Nylund, Faculty of Law, University of Bergen (Norway), a. in relation to Poland, prof. dr hab. Andrzej Jakubecki, Faculty of Law and Administration, UMCS (Poland). Undoubtedly, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a leap in digitization. This issue was discussed by: prof. Dr. Fernando Gasc\u00f3n Inhausti, Professor of Procedural Law, Complutense University de Madrid Law School (Spain), prof. dr Vigita V\u0117brait\u0117, Faculty of Law, Vilnius University (Lithuania) and prof. dr Irina Izarowa, Faculty of Law of the Kiev National University Taras Shevchenko (Ukraine).<\/p>\n
The third panel was devoted to changes in the organization of proceedings in the comparative aspect and in national law. This issue was presented by prof. dr Remco van Rhee \u2013 professor of the history of European law and comparative civil procedure at the University of Maastricht, director of the program \u201cBasics and rules of civil procedure in Europe\u201d and dr hab. Piotr Rylski, prof. UW, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw.<\/p>\n
In the fourth panel, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the right to a court in terms of the principle of open justice was developed (dr hab. Anna Machnikowska, prof. UG, Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Gda\u0144sk and Katica Artukovic, judge, ODIHR \/ OSCE expert, Bosnia and Herzegovina ) and the principle of invariability of the composition (dr hab. Krystian Markiewicz, prof. U\u015a, judge, Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Silesia, Interdisciplinary Center for Research on the Justice System of the University of Silesia, President of the Association of Polish Judges \u201cIustitia\u201d (Poland) and Dr. Dragos C\u0103lin, judge, ODIHR expert \/ OSCE (Romania).<\/p>\n
The culmination of the first day of the conference was the awarding of the award for the best master’s thesis in the 7th Competition of the Polish Civil Process quarterly and the Scientific Society of Civil Processists. At the meeting of the Competition Committee composed of: Prof. Feliks Zedler (Chairman), Prof. dr. hab. \u0141ukasz B\u0142aszczak, dr. hab. prof. URz Anna Ko\u015bci\u00f3\u0142ek, dr hab. Tadeusz Zembrzuski and dr hab. Katarzyna Gajda-Roszczynialska (Secretary) voted and a decision was made to award prizes in the competition for the best master’s thesis in the discipline of civil proceedings, taking into account the following criteria: practical usefulness and topicality of the topic, compliance of the title of the master’s thesis with its content, complementarity of the literature and jurisprudence used, substantive content the work and the correctness and novelty of the formulated conclusions, linguistic correctness and exhaustion of the topic. In accordance with the decision of the Competition Committee, the first prize was awarded ex aequo to: mgr Iga Kozio\u0142 for the thesis entitled \u201cCourt reconciliation of the record gender of a transsexual person\u201d (Adam Mickiewicz University in Pozna\u0144) written under the supervision of prof. dr hab. Pawe\u0142 Grzegorczyk and mgr Klaudia Katarzyna Pluta for the thesis entitled \u201cProceedings in cases for the collection of a child abducted from abroad\u201d (Adam Mickiewicz University in Pozna\u0144) written under the supervision of\u00a0 dr hab. Marcin Walasik prof. AMU. The second place went to mgr Iga Anna Makulska for the thesis entitled \u201cRequest for information under copyright and industrial property law\u201d (Maria Curie-Sk\u0142odowska University in Lublin) written under the supervision of prof. dr hab. Andrzej Jakubecki. The competition jury awarded the third prize to mgr Joanna W\u00f3jcik for the work entitled \u201cProceedings for the declaration of acquisition of real estate by prescription\u201d (University of Silesia) written under the supervision of dr hab. Krystian Markiewicz prof. U\u015a.<\/p>\n
On May 27, 2022, the first panel was devoted to more general issues. The speeches of prof. Stanis\u0142aw Walto\u015b, prof. Ewa \u0141\u0119towska, prof. Pawe\u0142 Wili\u0144ski and prof. Piotr Hofma\u0144ski presented how states of emergency, including the COVID-19 pandemic, can affect the functioning of the criminal law and the process of administering justice, how they can be misused by the legislator for completely different purposes, and where, then, the limits of possible modification of the procedure are.<\/p>\n
The second part presents how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the functioning of the criminal justice system in various legal systems. The papers were delivered by: Judge of Landgericht in Munich, Roland Kempfle LL.M., Judge of the Court of Appeal and President of the Danish Judges\u2019 Association Mikael Sj\u00f6berg, prof. dr. Marc de Werd from the Netherlands, and prof. Oksana Kaplina from the University of Kharkiv.<\/p>\n
The third panel was devoted to changes in the domestic law. Professor Rados\u0142aw Olszewski presented the problem of changes introduced in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic in the area of \u200b\u200bcoercive measures, att. Hanna Gajewska-Kraczkowska presented the issue of the impact of the pandemic on the implementation of the principle of open court proceedings, prof. Jerzy Skorupka dealt with the problem of limitation due to the pandemic COVID-19 rules of collegiality, and prof. Hanna Paluszkiewicz presented a paper on the impact of the pandemic on the time limits in the law and criminal trial.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n
<\/p>\n
Materia\u0142 filmowy z pierwszego dnia konferencji<\/h3>\n
(nagranie dost\u0119pne w j\u0119zyku angielskim, napisy wygenerowane s\u0105 automatycznie)<\/span><\/p>\n