{"id":6123,"date":"2021-10-08T22:58:42","date_gmt":"2021-10-08T20:58:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/szkola-doktorska\/?page_id=6123"},"modified":"2025-02-05T09:50:42","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T08:50:42","slug":"ocenia-srodokresowa-po-drugim-roku-ksztalcenia-doktoranta","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/szkola-doktorska\/en\/ocena-srodokresowa\/ocenia-srodokresowa-po-drugim-roku-ksztalcenia-doktoranta\/","title":{"rendered":"Mid-term evaluation after second year od education"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row][vc_column]\r\n
The mid-term evaluation is an evaluation of the implementation of an individual research plan, which each PhD candidate of a doctoral school takes place in the middle of his \/ her education. The evaluation is carried out by a three-person commission composed of at least one person with the degree of a habilitated doctor or the title of professor in the discipline in which the doctoral dissertation is being prepared, employed outside the unit running the Doctoral School or an employee of a foreign university who is determined by the scientific council of the relevant institute to have significant achievements in the scientific issues covered by the doctoral dissertation.<\/p>\n
The evaluation ends with a positive or negative result. A negative assessment is a basis for removing a PhD candidate from the list of doctoral students of the doctoral school. A positive result of the mid-term evaluation means that from the month following the evaluation of the PhD candidate’s scholarship, it amounts to at least 57 percent of the minimum salary of the professor (before the evaluation, it is at least 37 percent).<\/p>\n
The manner of conducting the mid-term evaluation is specified in the regulations of the doctoral school.<\/p>\n
Legal basis: Ustawa z dnia 20 lipca 2018 r. \u2013 Prawo o szkolnictwie wy\u017cszym i nauce (Dz. U. 2018, poz. 1668)<\/a>\u00a0art. 202, art. 209 ust. 10.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n The evaluation may take place in September at the request of the doctoral student or after September 30 at the initiative of the Doctoral School. The mid-term evaluation may take place earlier – in June or July – only in cases justified by the inability to carry it out later.<\/p>\n The mid-term evaluation before September 30 is initiated by the doctoral student by submitting an application to the Dean of the Doctoral School. The application will be approved if the doctoral student has closed the year, i.e. he or she has obtained all the obligatory credits, completed a didactic practice and submitted a correct report on the implementation of the IRP.<\/p>\n After September 30, if the doctoral student does not submit an application, the assessment is initiated by the Dean of the Doctoral School on the basis of documents that the doctoral student will deliver by September 30.<\/p>\n The assessment is in three stages:<\/p>\n After the mid-term evaluation is completed, the evaluation committee completes and signs the protocol.<\/p>\n Legal basis:<\/p>\n Resolution No. 257\/2022 of April 26, 2022, of the Senate of the University of Silesia (polish original: https:\/\/aktyprawne.us.edu.pl\/423\/d\/5653\/5\/<\/a>, english translation here: https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/szkola-doktorska\/en\/szkola-doktorska-w-uniwersytecie-slaskim\/<\/a> \r\n DS<\/strong> – Doctoral School at the University of Silesia in Katowice,<\/p>\n IRP<\/strong> – individual research plan (template on the website: https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/szkola-doktorska\/en\/indywidualny-plan-badawczy\/<\/a><\/p>\n report<\/strong> – a report on the implementation of the education program and the implementation of the doctoral student’s individual research plan at the Doctoral School at the University of Silesia in Katowice (template on the website: https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/szkola-doktorska\/indywidualny-plan-badniczego\/<\/a><\/p>\n abstract<\/strong> – an overview document regarding the research project, prepared by the doctoral student (approved by the supervisor) for members of the scientific council – summary of the substantive part of IPB (up to 2000 characters).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Completion of the year, submission of documents” tab_id=”dokumenty6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Stage I of the assessment – presentation to the scientific council of the discipline” tab_id=”rada6523-8773″]\r\n 1.The institute director sends an invitation to the part of the institute council meeting devoted to PhD candidates,<\/p>\n 2. In the part of the meeting at which the PhD candidate presents his project, apart from members of the institute council, the following participants are: the doctoral student, at least two members of the evaluation committee, and the supervisor\/supervisors.<\/p>\n 3. The PhD candidate appears before the institute council, presenting his research project and paying special attention to the already completed IRP parts (he has a maximum of twenty minutes).<\/p>\n 4. Members of the institute council, the evaluation committee, and the PhD candidate’s supervisor\/supervisors take part in the discussion.<\/p>\n 5. The PhD candidate’s speech is noted in the protocole of the institute council meeting (name and surname of the doctoral student and the subject of the project).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Stage II and III – assessments – work of the evaluation committee” tab_id=”komisja6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of a PhD candidate” tab_id=”doktorant6523-8773″]\r\n Note<\/strong><\/p>\n All documents should be delivered to the Doctoral School office to Ms. Agnieszka Szewczyk, in paper form, with original signatures. The exceptions are attachments to the report (publications), which should be uploaded to the disk via the link: https:\/\/ssd.us.edu.pl\/index.php\/s\/sk0s5vJmI3vF9IG<\/a>.<\/p>\n PhD students staying abroad, including PhD students from Sapienza University, can prepare scans of documents or documents signed electronically. Such documents should be forwarded to the Polish supervisor, who signs them in original and delivers them to the SD office.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of the supervisor (supervisors)” tab_id=”promotor6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of the chairman of the evaluation committee” tab_id=”przewodnicz\u0105cy6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of the members of the evaluation committee” tab_id=”cz\u0142onek6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of the institute director” tab_id=”dyrektor6523-8773″]\r\n In the case of an online meeting – by sending them a link to the meeting.<\/p>\n 2. Informs the members of the institute council about the inclusion of the PhD candidate’s speech in the council’s program and sends them an abstract provided by the supervisor and information about the role of the institute council in the mid-term evaluation of the PhD candidate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”The role of the institute council members” tab_id=”rada6523-8773″]\r\n \n<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_tta_section][\/vc_tta_accordion][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\nDecree No. 5\/2024 of the Dean of the Doctoral School<\/h3>
on the mid-term evaluation<\/h3>\r\n
\n
<\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>\r\n <\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column]\r\n
Mid-term evaluation 2024<\/h3> \r\n
\n
The course of the mid-term evaluation - detailed description<\/h3>\r\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n