{"id":1667,"date":"2020-01-20T13:18:35","date_gmt":"2020-01-20T12:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/?page_id=1667"},"modified":"2020-04-06T12:08:13","modified_gmt":"2020-04-06T10:08:13","slug":"27-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/nauka-i-badania\/serie-wydawnicze\/seria-e-learning\/11-e-learning-and-stem-education-articles\/27-2\/","title":{"rendered":"27"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>E-FORUM MODERATION AS AN ELEMENT OF BLENDED LEARNING COURSES FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. A RESEARCH &#8211; BASED STUDY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/Nieprzypisane\/el-2019-11-28-E-FORUM-MODERATION.pdf\" class=\"mtli_attachment mtli_pdf\" data-mtli=\"mtli_filesize557,04kB\">full-text article<\/a><\/p>\n<p>DOI: 10.34916\/el.2019.11.28<\/p>\n<p><strong>Anna Sajdak-Burska, Marek Ko\u015bcielniak<\/strong> Jagiellonian University (Poland)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong>: E-forum is widely recognized to be an effective method of students&#8217; learning. Research on processes and phenomena in synchronous (SOD) and asynchronous (AOD) discussion at e-forum date back to the first years of the new Millennium and explore both the role and tasks of the moderator as well as complex preconditions of a productive and satisfying students&#8217; participation. The present article focusses on moderation of e-forum discussion and in particular, on two crucial and challenging moments in e-forum moderation: opening and closing. The co-authors of this paper have constructed their perspective on e-forum moderation upon analysis of the role of discussion in the teaching\/learning process in face to face, e-learning, and b-learning settings. The final remarks and postulates follow conclusions from the original research study.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong>: e-forum moderation, online discussion forum, blended learning, e-learning, discussion, teacher role, student learning, teaching\/learning process, AOD, starting a discussion forum, closing down a discussion forum<\/p>\n<p><strong>REFERENCES<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Andersen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. <em>Educational Technology &amp; Society<\/em>, 12(1), 249\u2013257.<\/li>\n<li>Baker, C. (2010). The Impact of Instructor Immediacy and Presence for Online Affective Learning, Cognition, and Motivation. <em>The Journal of Educators Online<\/em>, 7(1), 1-30.<\/li>\n<li>Baker, D. L. (2013). Advancing Best Practices for Asynchronous Online Discussion. <em>Business Education Innovation Journal<\/em>, 5(1), June 2013, 11-21.<\/li>\n<li>Baran, E., Correia, A., Thompson, A. (2011) Transforming Online Teaching Practice: Critical Analysis of the Literature on the Roles and Competencies of Online Teachers. <em>Distance Education<\/em>, 3(32), 421\u2013439.<\/li>\n<li>Bere\u017anicki, F. (2001). <em>Dydaktyka kszta\u0142cenia og\u00f3lnego [The general didactics].<\/em> Krak\u00f3w: Impuls.<\/li>\n<li>Berge, Z. L. (2008). Changing Instructor\u2019s Roles in Virtual Worlds. <em>The Quarterly Review of Distance Education<\/em>, 9(4), 407-414.<\/li>\n<li>Bloom, B. (1956). <em>Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook I<\/em>: <em>The <\/em><em>Cognitive<\/em><em> Domain<\/em>. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.<\/li>\n<li>Brewer, S. i Klein, J. D. (2006). Types of positive interdependence and affiliation motive in an asynchronous, collaborative learning environment. <em>Educational Technology Research and Development<\/em>, 54(4), 331-354.<\/li>\n<li>Chan, J., Hew, K., Cheung, W. (2009). Asynchronous online discussion thread development: examining growth patterns and peer\u2010facilitation techniques. <em>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning<\/em>, 25, 438\u2013452.<\/li>\n<li>Cheung, W. S. and Hew, K. F. (2006). Examining students&#8217; creative and critical thinking and student to student interactions in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A Singapore case study. <em>Asia Pacific Cybereducation Journal<\/em>, 2(2).<\/li>\n<li>Chmielewski, K., Chomczy\u0144ski, P., G\u0142owacka, E., Mytkowski, D., Nafty\u0144ski, M., Niedzielska, E. i Zieli\u0144ski, W. (2013). <em>Diagnoza stanu kszta\u0142cenia na odleg\u0142o\u015b\u0107 w Polsce i wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej [<\/em><em>The diagnosis of distance education in Poland and chosen countries of European Union]<\/em><em>.<\/em> Warszawa: KOWEZiU.<\/li>\n<li>de Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., Simons, R.-J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. <em>Instructional Science<\/em>, 35(3) (May 2007), 257-286.<\/li>\n<li>de Leng, B. A., Dolmans, D. H., J\u00f6bsis, R., Muijtjens, A. M., van der Vleuten, C. P. (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. <em>Computers &amp; Education<\/em>, 53, 1\u201313.<\/li>\n<li>D\u00edaz, A. L. i Bl\u00e1zquez, E. F. (2009). Are the Functions of Teachers in e-Learning and Face-to-Face Learning Environments Really Different? <em>Educational Technology &amp; Society<\/em>, 12(4), 331\u2013343.<\/li>\n<li>Dooley, K. E. i Wickersham, L. E. (2007). Distraction, domination, and disconnection in whole-class, online discussions. <em>The Quarterly Review of Distance Education<\/em>, 8(1), 1-8.<\/li>\n<li>Echeverria, L., Cobos, R. i Morales, M. (2013). <em>Designing and evaluating collaborative learning scenarios in Moodle LMS courses. Cooperative design, visualization, and engineering<\/em> (61-66). Berlin &#8211; Heidelberg: Springer.<\/li>\n<li>Fung, Y. Y. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. <em>Open Learning<\/em>, 19(2), 135-149.<\/li>\n<li>Gall, M. D., Gillett, M. (1980). The Discussion Method in Classroom Teaching. Theory Into Practice 19(2). <em>Teaching Methods: Learning Applications<\/em><em>,<\/em> 98-103.<\/li>\n<li>Gao, F., Zhang, T. and Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. <em>British Journal of Educational Technology<\/em>, 44(3), 469\u2013483.<\/li>\n<li>Gao, F., Zhang, T., and Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. <em>British Journal of Educational Technology<\/em>, 44(3)\/2013, 469\u2013483.<\/li>\n<li>Gilbert, P. K. and Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. <em>British Journal of Educational Technology<\/em>, 36(1), 5-18.<\/li>\n<li>Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J., Steeples, C., Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: A special report<em>. Educational Technology, Research and Development<\/em> 49(1), 65-72.<\/li>\n<li>Goodyear, P. (2002). Teaching online. In <em>N<\/em>. <em>Hativa<\/em> and <em>P<\/em>. <em>Goodyear<\/em> (eds), <em>Teacher thinking<\/em>, <em>beliefs<\/em> and. <em>knowledge<\/em> in <em>higher education<\/em> (<em>79-101<\/em>). <em>Dordrecht<\/em>: Kluwer.<\/li>\n<li>Guldberg, K. and Pilkington, R. (2007). Tutor roles in Facilitating Reflection on Practice Through Online Discussion. <em>Journal of Educational Technology &amp; Society<\/em>, 10(1), Technology and Change in Educational Practice (January), 61-72.<\/li>\n<li>Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S. and Ling Ng, C. S. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: a review of the research and empirical exploration. <em>Instructional Science,<\/em> 38(6), November 2010,<br \/>\n571-606.<\/li>\n<li>Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. <em>Journal of the Learning Sciences<\/em>, 14(4), 567-589.<\/li>\n<li>Hull, D. M., Saxon, T. F. (2009). Negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge: An experimental analysis of asynchronous online instruction. <em>Computers &amp; Education<\/em>, 52(3), 624-639.<\/li>\n<li>Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., Hopkins, D. (1997). <em>Models of learning \u2013 tools for teaching. <\/em>Buckingham: Open University Press.<\/li>\n<li>Ko\u015bcielniak, M. (2004<em>). Zrozumie\u0107 Rogersa. Studium koncepcji pedagogicznych Carla R. Rogersa [Understanding Rogers. A study of Carl R. Rogers\u2019 pedagogical conceptions]. <\/em>Krak\u00f3w: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.<\/li>\n<li>Lan, F. L., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H. and Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioural patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e\/m-learning environments. <em>Computer &amp; Education,<\/em> 59(4), 1122\u20131135.<\/li>\n<li>Liu, C. and Tsai, C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. <em>Computers &amp; Education, <\/em>50(3), 627-639.<\/li>\n<li>Liu, X., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Lee, S. i Su, B. (2005). Exploring Four Dimensions of Online Instructor Roles: A Program Level Case Study. <em>Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks<\/em>, 9(4), 29-48.<\/li>\n<li>Loncar, M., Barrett, N. E. and Liu, G.-Z. (2014). Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. <em>Computers &amp; Education<\/em> 73, 93\u2013110.<\/li>\n<li>Maher Palenque, S. and DeCosta, M. (2015). Talking Techne: Techniques to Establish An Active Online Discussion Forum. <em>Journal<\/em> <em>of Instructional Research, <\/em>4, 83-89.<\/li>\n<li>Mazzolini, M. and Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. <em>Computers &amp; Education<\/em> 40(3), 237-253.<\/li>\n<li>Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., and Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. <em>Distance Education<\/em>, 33(1), 5\u201330.<\/li>\n<li>Neville, B. (2006). <em>Educating Psyche: Emotion, imagination, and the unconscious in learning. <\/em>Greensborough: Flat Chat Press.<\/li>\n<li>Niemierko, B. (1990). <em>Pomiar sprawdzaj\u0105cy w dydaktyce. Teoria i zastosowania. [Benchmark testing measurement. Theory and implementation<strong>]. <\/strong><\/em>Warszawa: Pa\u0144stwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.<\/li>\n<li>Niksa-Rynkiewicz, T. (2017). Podej\u015bcie nauczycieli akademickich do rozwoju narz\u0119dzi e-learningowych na wy\u017cszych uczelniach technicznych [The approach of technical university teachers to the development of e-learning tools.]. <em>EduAkcja. Magazyn edukacji elektronicznej<\/em> 1(14), 90-96.<\/li>\n<li>Oko\u0144, W. (1998). <em>Wprowadzenie do dydaktyki og\u00f3lnej [An introduction to the general didactics].<\/em> Warszawa: Wydawnictwo \u017bak.<\/li>\n<li>Perkins, C. and Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and Measuring Individual Engagement in Critical Thinking in Online Discussions: An Exploratory Case Study. <em>Educational Technology &amp; Society<\/em>, 9(1), 298\u2013307.<\/li>\n<li>Petty, G. (2014). <em>Teaching today. A practical guide<\/em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n<li>Redlarski, K. and Garnik, I. (2014). Zastosowanie system\u00f3w e-learningu w szkolnictwie wy\u017cszym [E-learning systems implementation in university education]. In B. A. Basi\u0144ska and I. Garnik (eds), <em>Zarz\u0105dzanie informacyjnym \u015brodowiskiem pracy [Information work environment magagement]<\/em> (77-94). Gda\u0144sk: Wydzia\u0142 Zarz\u0105dzania i Ekonomii Politechniki Gda\u0144skiej.<\/li>\n<li>Sajdak, A. (2013). <em>Paradygmaty kszta\u0142cenia student\u00f3w i wspierania rozwoju nauczycieli akademickich. <\/em><em>Teoretyczne podstawy dydaktyki akademickiej [Paradigms of student education and of supporting university teachers&#8217; professional development. Theoeretical foundations of university didactics].<\/em> Krak\u00f3w: Impuls.<\/li>\n<li>Sajdak, A. (2017<em>). <\/em>Aktywizowanie uczni\u00f3w w poszerzonym \u015brodowisku uczenia si\u0119 \u2013 mo\u017cliwo\u015bci wykorzystywania forum dyskusyjnego [Student activation in an extended learning environment &#8211; discussion forum implementation]. <em>Rocznik Lubuski<\/em>, 43(1). 163-174.<\/li>\n<li>Sajdak, A., Ko\u015bcielniak, M. (2014). Teacher competencies and skills for the enhancement of learners motivation within constructivism-based blended learning. <em>International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning,<\/em> 24(3\/4), 219-236.<\/li>\n<li>Theall, M., Wager, W. and Svinicki, M. (2019, 06 21). <em>Gaining A Basic Understanding of the Subject.<\/em> The IDEA Center Kansas State University. https:\/\/www.ideaedu.org\/Resources-Events\/Teaching-Learning-Resources\/Gaining-a-basic-understanding-of-the-subject (accessed on 27 May 2019).<\/li>\n<li>Thomas, J. (2013). Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review. <em>Computers &amp; Education <\/em>69 (2013), 199\u2013215.<\/li>\n<li>Wang, Q. (2008). Student-facilitators\u2019 Role in Moderating Online Discussions. <em>British Journal of Educational Technology<\/em>. 39(5), 859-874.<\/li>\n<li>Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. (2000). &#8222;It is what one does:&#8221; Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. <em>The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,<\/em> 9, 159-173.<\/li>\n<li>Yilmaz, E. O. and Yurdugul, H. (2016). Design and Effects of a Concept Focused Discussion Environment in E-Learning. <em>Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, <\/em>63, 353-374.<\/li>\n<li>Young, S. and Bruce, M. A. (2011). Classroom Community and Student Engagement in Online Courses. <em>MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,<\/em> 7(2). 219-230.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><\/p>\n<style type=\"text\/css\">a[data-mtli~=\"mtli_filesize557,04kB\"]:after {content:\" (557,04 kB)\"}<\/style>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>E-FORUM MODERATION AS AN ELEMENT OF BLENDED LEARNING COURSES FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. A RESEARCH &#8211; BASED STUDY full-text article DOI: 10.34916\/el.2019.11.28 Anna Sajdak-Burska, Marek Ko\u015bcielniak Jagiellonian University (Poland) Abstract: E-forum is widely recognized to be an effective method of students&#8217; learning. Research on processes and phenomena in synchronous (SOD) and asynchronous (AOD) discussion at e-forum [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/nauka-i-badania\/serie-wydawnicze\/seria-e-learning\/11-e-learning-and-stem-education-articles\/27-2\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":110,"featured_media":0,"parent":1452,"menu_order":27,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/inner-page.php","meta":{"_expiration-date-status":"saved","_expiration-date":0,"_expiration-date-type":"","_expiration-date-categories":[],"_expiration-date-options":[]},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1667"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/110"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1667"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2556,"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1667\/revisions\/2556"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/us.edu.pl\/wydzial\/wsne\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}