Przejdź do treści

Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

Wydział Sztuki i Nauk o Edukacji


full-text article

DOI: 10.34916/el.2019.11.11

Bartłomiej Gładysz, Izabela Maleńczyk Warsaw University of Technology (Poland)

Abstract: The authors present two pilot experiments they conducted to find out possibility of enhancement of traditional lectures with simple tools of electronic tests. The pilot research was performed in two different forms, for different courses and different subjects in order to make preliminary qualitative comparisons of the pros and cons of selected approaches. The described approaches were employed for selected lectures of Management and Production Engineering bachelor and master courses at the Faculty of Production Engineering (Warsaw University of Technology). Qualitative findings from the pilot  experiments will serve as a basis for the design of next rounds of experiment. The novelty of the experimental approach lays in application of electronic tests as a driver for students‟ engagement. The approach is based on an assumption that students are themselves designers of tests for specific lectures. Some questions, after verification by a lecturer, are later a part of an official final examination.

Keywords: educational innovation, traditional lecture, electronic tests


  • Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The chronicle of higher education, 12(19), 1-3
  • Bligh, D. (1998). What’s the use of lectures?. Exeter, United Kingdom: Intellect
  • Chen, C.M., & Wu, C.H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108-121
  • Dalsgaard, C., & Godsk, M. (2007). Transforming traditional lectures into problem‐based blended learning: challenges and experiences. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22(1), 29-42
  • Evans, C. (2009). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491-498
  • Gladysz, B., & Malenczyk, I. (2019). Exemplary test for Experiment A and Experiment B. (Aug 26th 2019)
  • Griffin, R.W., & Cashin, W.E. (1989). The lecture and discussion method for management education: Pros and cons. Journal of Management Development, 8(2), 25-32
  • Hutton, E.L. (2016). Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
  • Miller, H.L. (1927). Creative Learning and Teaching. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons
  • Wilson, K., & Korn, J.H. (2007). Attention During Lectures: Beyond
    Ten Minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 85-89
return to top