E-learning in the Time of COVID-19
Scientific Editor Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska
“E-learning”, 13, Katowice–Cieszyn 2021, pp. 49–64
HOW TO BALANCE SYNCHRONOUS AND ASYNCHRONOUS TEACHING AND LEARNING: A LOCAL STUDY
Olena Kuzminska 1, Nataliia Morze 2, Mariia Mazorchuk 3, Olha Barna 4, & Viktoriia Dobriak 5,
1 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 16a Heroev Oborony St., Kyiv, Ukraine 03041, email@example.com, ORCID 0000-0002-8849-9648
2 Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2 Bulvarno Kudriavska St., Kyiv, Ukraine 04053, firstname.lastname@example.org, ORCID 0000-0003-3477-9254
3 V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv, Ukraine 61022, email@example.com, ORCID 0000-0002-4416-8361
4 Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, 2 Maksxym Kryvonos St., Ternopil, Ukraine 46027, firstname.lastname@example.org, ORCID 0000-0002-2954-9692
5 LLC “Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic”, Mariupol, Ukraine, 71-A Sechenova St., Mariupol, Ukraine 87524, email@example.com, ORCID 0000-0002-4257-8973
Abstract: The transition of higher education institutions to distance learning, caused by the spread of COVID-19, has highlighted the need to minimize the social distance of students and teachers, with the updated the use of blended learning; accordingly, studying synchronous and asynchronous e-learning modes to support them. This article discusses the balance of synchronous and asynchronous teaching and learn- ing models and examines the attitude of teachers and students at higher education institutions to the choice of a particular learning mode. Based on the self-assessment of the educational process participants, the main factors influencing the choice of learning modes are presented, and the compliance of the obtained results with the developed theoretical model is analyzed. A comprehensive analysis of the survey results allowed us to assess the association between the adherence to a particular learning mode and gender, the status of the respondents, the type of educational activity, and the resource provision of the educational process. The proposed methodology and the obtained results can be used in the design of e-learning courses and the establishment of educational communication to ensure quality teaching and learning.
Keywords: Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Modes, Survey, Principal component analysis, Higher education institution, Distance learning.
A k c i l, U. & B a s t a s, M. (2021). Examination of University Students’ Attitudes towards E-learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Process and the Relationship of Digital Cit- izenship. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), ep291. https://doi.org/10.30935/ cedtech/9341.
A l q a h t a n i, A.Y. & R a j k h a n, A.A. (2020). E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learning Managerial Per- spectives. Education Sciences, 2020; 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216 (accessed 10 September 2021).
A n d e r s o n, L.W. & K r a t h w o h l, D.R. et al. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group). ISBN 080131903X.
B e r g l a n d, J. (2020). Blended, Flipped, And Remote Learning: What’s The Difference? TechNotes TCEA, blog post, June 5, 2020. Retrieved from https://blog.tcea.org/blended- flipped-and-remote-learning/ (accessed 4 August 2021).
F i e l d, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publica- tions. Retrieved from https://edge.sagepub.com/field5e (accessed 4 August 2021). ISBN 978-1-4462-4917-8.
G o k s u, D.Y. & D u r a n, V. (2020). Flipped Classroom Model in the Context of Distant Training. Research Highlights in Education and Science, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.isres.org/books/chapters/Rhes2020-104-127_29-12-2020.pdf (accessed 4 August 2021). ISBN 978-605-69854-8-5.
H e n g, K. & S o l, K. (2020). Online learning during COVID-19: Key challenges and sug- gestions to enhance effectiveness. Cambodian Education Forum. Retrieved from https://cambodianeducationforum.wordpress.com/2020/12/08/online-learning-during-covid- 19-key-challenges-and-suggestions-to-enhance-effectiveness/ (accessed 4 August 2021).
H r a s t i n s k i, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. EDUCAUSE, 17 No- vember. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and- synchronous-elearning (accessed 4 August 2021).
I r v i n e, V., C o d e, J., & R i c h a r d s, L. (2013). Realigning higher education for the 21st- century learner through multi-access learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org (accessed 4 August 2021). ISSN 1558-9528.
J o l l i f f e, I. (2002). Principal Component Analysis, 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag New York, Secaucus, NJ. ISBN 0-387-95442-2.
K a i s e r, H.F. & R i c e, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and psychological measure- ment, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115.
K h a n, B.H. (2006). Flexible Learning in an Information Society: Hershey PA17033: Infor- mation Science Publishing (August 7, 2006), USA. ISBN 1-5990-4325-4.
K u t n e r, M., N a c h t s h e i m, C., N e t e r, J., & L i, W. (2004). Applied Linear Statistical Mod- els, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Homewood, IL. ISBN 0-07-238688-6.
K u z m i n s k a, О., M a z o r c h u k, M., M o r z e, N., P a v l e n k o, V., & P r o k h o r o v, A. (2019). Study of Digital Competence of the Students and Teachers in Ukraine, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1007, 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13929-2_8.
L e v e s q u e, R. (2005). SPSS Programming and Data Management, 2nd Edition. A Guide for SPSS and SAS Users. Chicago: SPSS Inc. ISBN 1-56827-355-X.
B o w e r, M., D a l g a r n o, B., K e n n e d y, G., L e e, M.J.W., & K e n n e y, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp edu.2015.03.006/ (accessed 4 August 2021).
M o r z e, N. & K u z m i n s k a, O. (2017). Blended learning in practice of e-learning managers training, Distance learning, simulation and communication, 121–127. ISSN 978-80-7231- 415-7.
S c h e i d e r e r, J. (2021). What’s the Difference Between Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning? Ohio State Online, blog post, March 24, 2021. Retrieved from https://online. osu.edu/resources/learn/whats-difference-between-asynchronous-and-synchronous- learning (accessed 4 August 2021).
S m y r n o v a -Tr y b u l s k a, E., K u z m i n s k a, O., & M o r z e, N. (2017). Flipped learning model: tools and experience of implementation in higher education. The New Education- al Review, 49(3). ISSN: 1732-6729, 189–200 Retrieved from http://www.educationalrev.us.edu.pl/dok/volumes/tner_3_2017.pdf#page=189 (accessed 4 August 2021). https://doi. org/10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.15.
Statistical research survey in Google Form, https://forms.gle/izrsJQKnwzVYYaB1A.
S u, F. (2019). Blended Learning Pedagogy in Higher Education. In: P e t e r s, M., H e r a u d,R. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-981-13-2262-4_19-1 (accessed 10 September 2021).
To s u n, N. (2021). Distance education practices at universities in Turkey: a case study dur- ing COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 313–333. EISSN-1562-0506.
W a h a b, А. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: a necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic Higher Education Studies Vol. 10, No. 3, 16–25. https:// doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.
W a t t s, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: a review of the literature. The Free Library. 2016. Information Age Publishing, Inc. 4 Aug. 2021/ Retrieved from https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Synchronous+and+asynchron ous+communication+in+distance+learning%3a+a…-a0458603383 (accessed 4 August 2021). ISSN-1528-3518.