E-learning in the Time of COVID-19
Scientific Editor Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska
“E-learning”, 13, Katowice–Cieszyn 2021, pp. 137–150
https://doi.org/10.34916/el.2021.13.12
PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MOOC PROJECT: A CASE STUDY
Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska 1, Iryna Sekret 2, & Nataliia Morze 3
1 University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Education, Bielska 62, 43-440 Cieszyn, Poland, esmyrnova@us.edu.pl, ORCID 0000-0003-1227-014X
2 STARTINFORUM International Project Management and Business Consultancy, Turkey, Cumhuriyet Caddesi, Izzet Baysal Mahalesi, 14000 Merkez/Bolu, Turcja, irenesekret@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-4802-113X
3 Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine, Bulvarno-Kudriavska St, 18/2, Kyiv, Ukraina, 04053, n.morze@kubg.edu.ua, ORCID 0000-0003-3477-9254
Abstract: This study describes the aims, structure and content of MOOCs “Contem- porary ICT tools and innovative methods of creative education”, developed by the international research group within the project “Direction to the MOOCs”. It sheds light on the pedagogy of its development and the content of the MOOCs modules. The study also analyses the students’ feedback after their participation in MOOCs, concerning their satisfaction with the MOOCs content, volume, the course difficulty, and its technical operation. The obtained and analysed data allowed us to trace the positive dynamics between the 1st and 2nd editions of MOOCs implemented in 2020 and 2021 in Polish in terms of their quality and student satisfaction.
Keywords: MOOCs, Navoica, evaluation, online learning, survey.
REFERENCES
A g u d o – A r r o y o, Y. & C a l l e j o – G a l l e g o, J. (2021). Evaluating assessment in MOOCs [La evaluación de la evaluación por pares en los MOOC] MagisOpen Access 14, 1–27. ISSN 20271174, https:/doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA. M14.EAIN.
B a l i, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. MER- LOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.24059/ olj.v22i2.1160. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud. org/files/bali_ 0314.pdf.
C l a r k, D. (2013). MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Donald Clark Plan B, Tuesday, April 16, 2013, Retrieved from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/moocs-
taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html (accessed 20 March 2016).
Definition Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Retrieved from https://www.openuped. eu/images/docs/Definition_Massive_Open_Online_Courses.pdf.
G r o d e c k a, K., K a c z m a r e k- K a c p r z a k, A., K o ł o d z i e j e k, A., K u r o w s k a – W i l – c z y ń s k a, K., M o k w a -Ta r n o w s k a, I., M u c z y ń s k i, B., & P e s z k o, P. (2019). Praca zbiorowa NAVOICA Polska platforma edukacyjna oferująca kursy typu MOOC Wytycz- ne dla twórców kursów [Warszawa 2019 NAVOICA Polish educational platform offer- ing MOOCs Guidelines for course developers.] Wydawnictwo Fundacja Młodej Nauki, Warszawa 2020.
H o l l a n d s, F. & K a z i, A. (2019, June 3). MOOC-based credentials: What’s the value to the learner? EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2019/6/ mooc-based-alternative-credentials-whats-the-value-for-the-learner.
J a n s e n, D. & G o e s – D a n i e l s, M. (2016). Comparing Institutional MOOC strategies: Sta- tus report based on a mapping survey conducted in October–December 2015. EADTU, August 2016. ISBN 978-90-79730-23-0.
K h a l i d, A., L u n d q v i s t, K., & Ya t e s, A. (2021). A literature review of implemented rec- ommendation techniques used in Massive Open online Courses. Expert Systems with Applications 187 January 2022 Article number 115926 ISSN 09574174, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2021.115926.
O z a n, O. & O z a r s l a n, Y. (2016). Video lecture watching behaviors of learners in online courses, Educational Media International. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.11892
55. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303693870_Video_lecture_watching_behaviors_of_ learners_in_online_courses. Polish MOOCs platform Navoica www.navoica.pl.
R o d r i g u e z, C.O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Dis- tance and E-Learning, 2012(2). ISSN 1027-5207. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/? p=current&article&article=516.
S e k r e t, I. (2016). Problems, Experiences, and Perspectives of Implementing Social Media in Online Tutoring. In: M. Tu r c a n i, Z. B a l o g h, M. M u n k, L. B e n k o. Conference Proceedings: 11th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied In- formatic (DIVAI) Sturovo, Slovakia Date: MAY 02–04, 2016 DIVAI 2016 (pp. 407–420). ISBN 978‐80‐7552‐249‐8, ISSN 2464‐7470 (Print), ISSN 2464‐7489 (On‐line).
S e k r e t, I. & J a n s e n, D. (2019 b). Multilevel Study of the Higher Education Challenges Caused by the Migration Crisis in Turkey. In: E. S m y r n o v a -Tr y b u l s k a, P. K o m – m e r s, N. M o r z e, J. M a l a c h (Eds.). Universities in the Networked Society: Cultural Diversity and Digital Competences in Learning Communities. Critical Studies of Educa- tion 10, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland (pp. 155–170), ISBN 978- 3-030-05025-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05026-9_9.
S e k r e t, I., D u r m u s, S., G u r e r, M.D., & C u r a o g l u, O. (2019 a). From Face-to-Face Teaching to Online Tutoring: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives. In: E. S m y r n o v a – Tr y b u l s k a, P. K o m m e r s, N. M o r z e, & J. M a l a c h (Eds.). Universities in the Net- worked Society: Cultural Diversity and Digital Competences in Learning Communities. Critical Studies of Education 10 (pp. 171–183), ISBN 978-3-030-05026-9, Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05026-9_10.
S m y r n o v a -Tr u b u l s k a, E., M c K a y, E., M o r z e, N., Ya k o v l e v a, O., I s s a, T., & I s s a, Th. (2019). Develop and Implement MOOCs Unit: a Pedagogical Instruction for Academ- ics, Case Study In: E. S m y r n o v a -Tr y b u l s k a, P. K o m m e r s, N. M o r z e, J. M a l a c h (Eds.). Universities in the Networked Society. Cultural Diversity and Digital Compe- tences in Learning Communities. Springer. Critical Studies of Education 10 (pp. 103– 132), ISBN 978-3-030-05025-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05026-9_7.
S m y r n o v a -Tr y b u l s k a, E., O g r o d z k a – M a z u r, E., S z a f r a ń s k a – G a j d z i c a, A., M o r z e, N., M a k h a c h a s h v i l i, R., N o s k o v a, T., P a v l o v a, T., Ya k o v l e v a, O., I s s a, T., & I s s a, Th. (2016). MOOCs – Theoretical And Practical Aspects: Comparison Of Selected Research Results: Poland, Russia, Ukraine, and Australia. In: P. K o m m e r s,
T. I s s a, Th. I s s a, E. M c K a y, & P. I s a í a s. Proceedings Of The International Confer- ences On Internet Technologies & Society 2016 (ITS 2016) Educational Technologies 2016 (IcEduTech 2016) And Sustainability, Technology And Education 2016 (STE 2016) Mel- bourne, Australia 6–8 December, IADIS 2016 (pp. 107–114). ISBN: 978-989-8533-58-6.
S u, P.-Y., G u o, J.-H., & S h a o, Q.-G. (2021). Construction of the quality evaluation index system of MOOC platforms based on the user perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) Open Access, 13(20). ISSN 20711050, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011163.
The ADDIE Model: Instructional Design, Educational Technology Retrieved from http:// educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/.